Modern Steel Construction - November 2025

Steel on Schedule

Todd R. Campbell, PE and Chris Gottschall 2025-10-06 15:27:34

Close coordination between project team members maximized structural steel’s cost and construction speed advantages.

SPEED FEATURE STORY

The 20-story Honickman Center had a rigid five-year schedule from design to opening.The pleated glass façade is the building’s signature element. Bruce Damonte

A MEDICAL CENTER in Philadelphia had a non-negotiable budget and five-year schedule, and choosing structural steel for its frame helped the architect and structural engineer adhere to both.

The project team for the Jefferson Health Honickman Center, a 20-story, 450,000-sq.-ft medical building, leaned on tight coordination and leveraged partnerships to find schedule savings and stay within the budget. Design began in 2019, and the key schedule-reducing measures—and by extension, cost reductions—came in design and fabrication. More than 5,700 tons of steel were included in the bid, and the mill order was fast-tracked using quantities from the 100% design development drawing package. The design team simultaneously worked towards producing the 100% construction documents, all with the aim of reducing the overall schedule and procuring steel ahead of the economic challenges of COVID.

Structural engineer of record IMEG and fabricator Cives Steel collaborated to complete all connection design. Cives hired IMEG to design non-major connections that were part of the fabrication package rather than hiring another engineer to design and stamp those connections for IMEG to then approve. By hiring IMEG for all parts of connection design, Cives received connections optimized for its shop standards and enhanced by IMEG’s knowledge of the building design. Their partnership helped avoid costly RFIs and delays, reinforcing the time- and budget-conscious approach throughout construction.

The Honickman Center’s success also hinged on structural steel’s unmatched ability to address the building’s robust programming scope. The building brings together 19 previously dispersed specialty clinics—including oncology, urology, cardiology, and digestive health—into one integrated hub. It had a demanding structural program, including rigorous serviceability criteria for imaging and procedure spaces and similarly demanding criteria to meet acoustics privacy needs, complex truss transfers, high floor-to-floor levels and challenging façade support requirements. Steel’s high strength-to-weight ratio enabled longer spans and minimized the number of columns, allowing for larger, open clinical areas that support project goals like flexible room layouts and future reconfigurations.

Philadelphia zoning rules meant the building had to keep a sightline to City Hall. Bruce DamonteThe truss framing system without the façade IMEGwith the façade on the third floor is part of a cantilever over the entrance driveway. HSS outriggers for façade support are visible in the framing photo.  Bruce Damonte

Framing and Vibrations

Zoning requirements mandated the building have vertical setbacks to keep a sightline to Philadelphia’s historic City Hall. This meant IMEG’s structural design needed to accommodate building setbacks with transfer beams and special detailing to horizontally transfer some of the building’s lateral force-resisting frames. The architect used one of the setback areas as an outdoor roof terrace space at the 15th floor, which required IMEG to provide special support details for an 8-ft-tall glass screen wall.

The superstructure design implemented structural steel with a minimum LOD of 350 as the basis of design instead of typical industry standard LOD of 300. Due to intense mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, gusset plates, bolts and angles for truss and braced frame connections were 3D-modeled to coordinate with those systems. The coordinated model saved time by discovering potential conflicts during design, avoiding costly field conflicts and modifications. High ceiling heights meant beam web penetrations and beam end notches were required in Level 2 beams to allow for MEP distribution.

A 42-ft-deep mechanical well required vertical truss frames to support mechanical screen walls and shield large rooftop equipment. IMEGThe Honickman Center has about 5,700 tons of steel. Bruce Damonte

IMEG also undertook vibration analysis to ensure imaging, surgical, and exam floors met Facility Guidelines Institute (FGI) guidelines for outpatient facilities. The steel design needed to meet strict vibration criteria, especially for imaging floors with MRI and CT scanners, which are located over a mechanical room of 2,000 P-in. per second. IMEG provided criteria on the structural drawings to restrict the direct attachment of mechanical systems to the fourth floor’s steel.

The rooftop mechanical systems needed catwalk framing at the roof and within the mechanical rooms. A 42-ft-deep mechanical well required vertical truss frames to support the tall mechanical screen walls and shield large rooftop equipment such as emergency generators and cooling towers sitting on dunnage framing.

Eight transfer trusses supporting Level 4 range from 15 ft to 30 ft deep and transfer columns above, accommodating an open ground-level lobby. Likewise, the rooftop mechanical penthouse and third-floor mechanical room demanded careful integration of steel framing and building systems to support heavy equipment and meet acoustic performance targets.

An embedded W-shape in the concrete garage structure is part of the transfer system for the building’s shear forces. IMEGA typical façade support with curtain wall connections. IMEG

Garage Transition

The building rests atop the concrete columns and walls of a 120,000-sq.-ft, three-level, below-grade cast-in-place concrete garage. The transition from concrete to steel required meticulous structural planning, including the use of a full-building mat foundation up to 8 ft thick. IMEG developed details to transfer gravity and lateral loads into the concrete structure, using embedded W12×279 members as drag struts for the transfer.

The building’s western plaza was also designed with adaptability in mind. The below-grade structure includes overbuild capacity on its west side for future office or residential space, along with a connecting bridge, a strategic investment in long-term flexibility. Above this base, structural steel provided the versatility and ease of integration that enabled the team to overcome both technical and spatial constraints.

Grade 65 steel was used for W-shape columns, ranging from W14×90 through W14×730 sections. Because of high loads from transfers and tall floor heights at ground level, the largest-rolled W14 columns were not sufficient at all column locations. Box columns weighing more than 1,000 lb/ft were built-up from plates to support the loads at a few locations. Plates were up to 6 in. thick in the built-up shapes and some baseplates. IMEG also provided built-up I-shaped columns as alternatives to W14×808 and W14×873 sections. All plate thicknesses were sourced as grade 50 A572.

Fitting the Urban Fabric

Architecturally, the building’s sculpted glass façade—resembling pleated fabric—pays tribute to Philadelphia’s textile heritage. The façade design choice enhances the urban skyline while also improving thermal performance through strategic fritting and shading.

IMEG studied multiple design options to support the curved curtain wall façade, including straight slab versus faceted slab edges, rotation of floor deck at the perimeter, “diving board” plate detail, and the chosen scheme, HSS outriggers off spandrel beams. Due to the curved nature of the curtain wall façade system, more than 1,000 HSS outriggers of various lengths and miscellaneous bracing were required. Estimated tonnage for façade support steel was over 50 tons.

Analyzed façade support spandrel beams with FEM models and hand calculations validating torsional capacity and stiffnesses.A typical HSS outrigger support for the façade. IMEG

Design of the spandrel beams to support the façade required careful analysis, as the curved nature imposed significant torsional moments on W-shape beams. IMEG used finite element and hand calculations to size spandrel members for strength and stringent deflection limits.

Coordination of this façade system required significant effort with tower architect Ennead Architects, envelope consultant Heintges, and design assist façade contractor New Hudson Facades. IMEG participated in more than 80 coordination meetings for the façade and developed more than 20 unique perimeter support details.

Inside, the structural layout enabled design elements, such as expansive “sky lobbies” featuring natural light, floor plate transitions to preserve city views, and garden-integrated oncology suites. These elements could only be realized with steel’s flexibility and spanning capabilities.

The HSS outrigger façade support system at a corner.The detail for the façade corner support, which was one of 20-plus perimeter support details.The transfer truss in the third-floor mechanical room over the entrance lobby. IMEGOne of the first column lifts was installed with a tapered base plate to coordinate with architectural finishes. IMEG

The Honickman Center opened in March 2024—meeting the five-year-schedule—as the final piece of a $1 billion East Market redevelopment in the heart of Philadelphia. Through early collaboration and strategic structural design, the project team delivered a high-performance healthcare facility symbolizing how steel can turn ambitious visions into reality on time, on budget, and with enduring quality.

Owner/Tenant

Jefferson Health

Architect of Record

Ennead Architects

Garage/Master Plan Architect

Perkins Eastman

Construction Manager

LF Driscoll/Hunter Roberts (joint venture)

Structural Engineer

IMEG

Steel Fabricator

Cives Steel Company


Todd R. Campbell

(todd.r.campbell@imegcorp.com) is an associate principal and structural technical standards manager, and Chris Gottschall (chris.c.gottschall@imegcorp.com) is an associate and senior project manager, both at IMEG.

©AISC. View All Articles.

Steel on Schedule
https://lsc-pagepro.mydigitalpublication.com/article/Steel+on+Schedule/5052287/853972/article.html

Menu
  • MSC Site Home
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • List of Advertisers
  • Search Digital Archive (2010-present)
  • Search PDF Archive (Pre-2010)
  • Advertising Information
  • Mange Print Subscriptions
  • Contact MSC
  • AISC Site Home

Issue List

March 2026

February 2026

January 2026

December 2025

November 2025

October 2025

September 2025

August 2025

July 2025

June 2025

May 2025

April 2025

March 2025

February 2025

January 2025

December 2024

November 2024

October 2024

September 2024

August 2024

July 2024

June 2024

May 2024

April 2024

March 2024

February 2024

January 2024

December 2023

November 2023

October 2023

September 2023

August 2023

July 2023

June 2023

May 2023

April 2023

March 2023

February 2023

January 2023

December 2022

November 2022

October 2022

September 2022

August 2022

July 2022

June 2022

May 2022

April 2022

March 2022

February 2022

January 2022

December 2021

November 2021

October 2021

September 2021

August 2021

July 2021

June 2021

May 2021

April 2021

March 2021

February 2021

January 2021

December 2020

November 2020

October 2020

September 2020

August 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

December 2019

November 2019

October 2019

September 2019

August 2019

July 2019

June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

NASCC: The Steel Conference

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019

December 2018

November 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011/NASCC

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010


Library