Modern Steel Construction - June 2021

Compressions Member Design: A Primer

Richard M. Drake, SE, And Erik Espinoza, SE 2021-05-07 08:27:14

Tips on compression design as it is addressed in the AISC Spec.

Richard M. Drake (rick.drake@fluor.com) is a senior fellow in structural engineering, and Erik Espinoza (erik.espinoza@fluor.com) is a director in structural engineering, both with Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

Last month's SteelWise article, also written by Drake and Espinoza, focused on tension member design. You can read it in the Archives section at www.modernsteel.com.

LAST MONTH’S STEELWISE was all about tension in member design.

This month, it’s compression’s turn.

Here, we’ll highlight key steps for designing compression members according to the provisions of the 2016 AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/ AISC 360, aisc.org/specifications). Note that we’ll focus solely on W-shape columns, though much of the material is readily applicable to other rolled shapes as well.

A compression member is any member that is loaded with an axial compression force. Compression members are commonly located in building columns, structural bracing, and top chords of trusses. Loads transfer to a building column from the columns above and from beams framing into it. If the center of gravity of the loads coincides with the center of gravity of the column, then the column is considered concentrically loaded, though in practice, columns are seldom concentrically loaded. Ideal concentrically loaded columns do not exist since all columns have accidental eccentricities resulting from material imperfections, end connections, initial crookedness of rolled shape, eccentric loads, and residual stresses (see Figure 1).

Fig. 1. Common loading eccentricities.

Application of external load (P) at eccentricity (e) introduces flexural stress. If the member is short, the lateral deflection is small, and the eccentricity will introduce negligible flexural stresses—and the column can take a lot of axial load before buckling. If the member is long, the lateral deflection is large, and the eccentricity can introduce significant flexural stresses—and the column will take much less axial load before buckling.

Elastic Column Behavior

Critical buckling. Consider an ideal concentrically loaded column, making the following assumptions:

• The column is braced against lateral translation (sidesway) but allowed to rotate at each end.
• The column is perfectly straight
• The load is applied along the column’s centroidal axis.
• The column material behaves elastically.

If the axial load (P) is gradually applied, then the column will eventually buckle into the deflected shape of a simply supported beam. AISC calls this limit state flexural buckling. The axial load that forces the buckled shape is the critical buckling load (Pcr). The column buckles before the axial stress level reaches the material yield stress. The column is entirely elastic and is a function of its flexural stiffness (EI), as shown by Euler’s critical load formula:

Dividing both sides of the equation by the column crosssectional area will convert this relationship to the critical stress, as used in the Specification. For mathematical convenience, define the radius of gyration (r) as:

Yield strength (Fy) and tensile strength (Fu) have no effect on the critical stress. A36 and A992 steels have the same modulus of elasticity and will buckle at the same load for a given column size and support condition. If this elastic critical buckling stress (Fcr) exceeds the material yield strength, then the critical stress equation is not applicable.

Every column has an X-axis and Y-axis, each with its own I (area moment of inertia), r and L (length). Every column will flexurally buckle about the axis with the highest slenderness ratio (L /r) and therefore the lowest critical stress (see Figure 2).

Fig. 2. Flexural buckling of columns can occur about either major axis.

Effective Length

The concept of effective length is simply a mathematical method of replacing a given column with an equivalent pinnedend column braced against side sway. In other words, the elastic flexural buckling length is equal to KL, where K is the effective length factor and L is the column length between supports.

Effective length factors can be derived by repeating the critical buckling load differential equation derivation with different boundary conditions, and they can also be determined graphically (see Figure 3).

Specification Commentary Table C-A-7.1 provides a summary of theoretical effective length factors based on upper bound derivations. It also provides recommended values that should be used in design in recognition that member end boundary conditions are rarely fully pinned or fully fixed. Note that in the Specification, KL is replaced with Lc.

Fig. 3. Example column effective lengths.

Local Buckling

Structural steel shapes are comprised of rectangular plate elements, each with its own aspect ratio (λ). See Figure 4 for an example W-shape.

Fig. 4. W-shape plate elements.

For W-shapes:

Fig. 5. Local buckling of unstiffened elements.

If an individual plate element has a high aspect ratio, it may become unstable and experience local buckling before flexural buckling of the overall section can occur. The section plate elements are classified into two types based on their boundary conditions and unstiffened and stiffened elements. Unstiffened elements are supported along only one edge parallel to the normal compressive force and will buckle like a cantilever beam (see Figure 5). Stiffened elements, on the other hand, are supported along both edges parallel to the normal compressive force and will buckle like a fixed end beam (see Figure 6).

Fig. 6. Local buckling of stiffened elements.

Specification Section B4 includes a classification system to identify the compressive members that may experience local buckling before flexural buckling. Limiting width-to-thickness ratios (λr) for local buckling have been developed based on elastic plate buckling theory and are listed in Specification Table B4.1a for members subject to axial compression.

Compression members are classified as non-slender element sections if all elements have aspect ratios less than or equal to the limiting width-to-thickness ratios.

λ ≤ λr

Compression members are classified as slender-element sections if any elements have aspect ratios that are greater than or equal to the limiting width-to-thickness ratios. Compression tests on short W-shapes (called column stubs) show that all fibers on the cross section are not stressed at the same level. Residual stresses cause early yielding, followed by inelastic behavior.

λ > λr

Fig. 7. Typical residual stresses in a rolled shape.

Inelastic Column Behavior

Residual stresses. Residual stresses are the stresses that remain in a member after it has been rolled into a finished shape (see Figure 7). Sources of residual stresses in structural steel include uneven cooling, which occurs after hot rolling of structural shapes. Note the following:

• The thicker flanges cool more slowly than the thinner webs

• Flange tips have greater exposure to air and cool more quickly

• Compression residual stresses exist in regions that cool the quickest

• Tension residual stresses occur in the regions that cool the slowest Other causes of residual stress include cold bending or cambering during fabrication, punching of holes, cutting, or welding during fabrication.

When a compression load is applied to a column, the parts of the column with residual compressive stresses will reach the material yield stress before the rest of the section and go into the plastic range of behavior. The stiffness of the column will be reduced and become a function of the part of the column cross section that is still elastic. As the applied load increases, the column will buckle inelastically because part of the cross section has reached the yield stress before flexural buckling occurs.

Fig. 8. Column failure modes.

Failure Modes of Columns

Test results indicate the following:

• Columns with smaller slenderness ratios tend to buckle inelastically before elastic buckling can be achieved (see Figure 8).

• Short columns fail by yielding. Nominal compression strengths are predicted using yield stress theory.

• Long columns fail by elastic buckling. Nominal compression strengths are predicted by considering elastic buckling theory.

• Intermediate columns fail by inelastic buckling. Nominal compression strengths are predicted using empirical formulae. Most practical (economical) columns end up in this range.

Specification Requirements

When determining the nominal strength of a compression member (Pn), it is necessary to first classify the shape for axial compression. Members in axial compression that are classified as non-slender element sections can reach flexural buckling of the entire cross section before local buckling of any elements. Members in axial compression that are classified as slender element sections will experience local buckling of one or more elements before flexural buckling of the entire cross section.

Non-Slender and Slender Element Sections. Specification Section E3 applies to non-slender element sections as defined in Specification Section B4 for members in axial compression. There are multiple useful formulas that apply to these elements:

Determine the elastic buckling stress (Fe).

Determine the critical stress (Fcr) using the appropriate equation, depending on the column slenderness ratio L(c)/r.

For short and intermediate columns: When

For long columns: When

Determine the nominal compression strength (Pn).

Pcr = Fcr Acr

Specification Section E7 applies to slender element sections as defined in Section B4 for members in axial compression. The procedure is not included here for brevity.

Manual Design Aids

Column load tables. AISC has created over 200 pages of column load tables to tabulate the calculated available strength for common column shapes and sizes, reasonable effective lengths, and common material strengths. These tables are located in Part 4 of the AISC Steel Construction Manual (aisc.org/manual).

For each shape, the tables consider the most common material yield stress only, including:

• W-shapes (W14 and smaller), Fy = 50, 65, and 70 ksi

• HP-shapes, Fy= 50 ksi

• Rectangular HSS, Fy = 50 ksi

• Round HSS, Fy = 46 ksi

• WT-shapes, Fy = 50 ksi

• Double-angles, Fy = 36 ksi

• Single-angles, Fy = 36 ksi

Note that while the double and single angles are listed as 36 ksi in the 15th Edition of the Manual, they will be updated to 50 ksi in the 16th Edition.

You must use Specification formulas for other shapes and yield stresses. Tables are limited to Lc/r <= 200 because AISC prefers that you not exceed this.

Tables assume that weak-axis buckling will govern the column design and are calculated based on Lcy in feet. If Lc is not the same for both axes, then the table may still be used to determine the available strength by converting the X-axis effective length, Lcx, to an equivalent Y-axis effective length, Lcy(equiv).

Every column will buckle about the axis with the greater slenderness ratio, represented by the larger of Lcy orLcy(equiv). Enter the column load tables with the larger of Lcy or Lcy(equiv) and select the precalculated value for available strength. Table values consider the classification of sections for local buckling and are correct for all sections of Specification Chapter E, including Section E3 (non-slender) and Section E7 (slender).

Super tables. AISC has created nearly 100 pages of load tables to tabulate the calculated available strength for W-shapes ranging in size from W44 to W4 with Fy = 50 ksi. These tables are located in Part 6 of the Manual. AISC calls Manual Table 6-2 its “super table” because it combines some of the best design strength features of the Manual beam and column design aids. Although these tables were created to facilitate the design of members in combined flexure and axial compression, they are very useful for evaluating W-shape columns that are not included in the column load tables.

Additional Considerations

Although this primer is intended to summarize the nominal compression strength requirements in the Specification, designers are cautioned that the choice of member cross sections and connection details may introduce eccentricity and moment when designing compression members. In those cases, the designer should consult Specification Chapter H for combined flexure and axial forces.

©AISC. View All Articles.

Compressions Member Design: A Primer
https://lsc-pagepro.mydigitalpublication.com/article/Compressions+Member+Design%3A+A+Primer/4028616/706928/article.html

Menu
  • MSC Site Home
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • List of Advertisers
  • Search Digital Archive (2010-present)
  • Search PDF Archive (Pre-2010)
  • Advertising Information
  • Mange Print Subscriptions
  • Contact MSC
  • AISC Site Home

Issue List

March 2026

February 2026

January 2026

December 2025

November 2025

October 2025

September 2025

August 2025

July 2025

June 2025

May 2025

April 2025

March 2025

February 2025

January 2025

December 2024

November 2024

October 2024

September 2024

August 2024

July 2024

June 2024

May 2024

April 2024

March 2024

February 2024

January 2024

December 2023

November 2023

October 2023

September 2023

August 2023

July 2023

June 2023

May 2023

April 2023

March 2023

February 2023

January 2023

December 2022

November 2022

October 2022

September 2022

August 2022

July 2022

June 2022

May 2022

April 2022

March 2022

February 2022

January 2022

December 2021

November 2021

October 2021

September 2021

August 2021

July 2021

June 2021

May 2021

April 2021

March 2021

February 2021

January 2021

December 2020

November 2020

October 2020

September 2020

August 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

December 2019

November 2019

October 2019

September 2019

August 2019

July 2019

June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

NASCC: The Steel Conference

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019

December 2018

November 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011/NASCC

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010


Library