Modern Steel Construction - January 2023

Forging a New Steel Story

Brian Sherman, PE, And Sean Pousley 2022-12-10 11:10:39

A recently completed multi-use complex helps lift an old steel town to new heights.

The completed 14-story, 524,838-sq.-ft SORA West office building (at right in photo). © Prakash Patel Photography

ONCE A THRIVING STEEL MILL TOWN, Conshohocken, Pa., has long been an area in transition.

Its proximity to Center City Philadelphia—a 15-minute drive—and accessibility to mass transit has perpetually made it an attractive commercial hub, but up until recently, growth had been haphazard. “Conshy,” as the locals call it, lacked a town center, and little thought had been given to walkability or parking.

Five braced frames were used to laterally brace the 184-ft-tall structure. Mal Bland

Keystone Development + Investment had a vision to change that and proposed SORA West, a multi-use complex that includes a new 14-story office building, a hotel, a parking garage, and a historic firehouse adapted into a restaurant, all built around a public plaza that hosts concerts and other events.

At the same time, pharmaceutical distributor AmerisourceBergen wanted to combine two locations into a single headquarters and increase its brand identity. The company, with a top ten ranking on the Fortune 500 list, studied labor conditions, trends, and workplace dynamics and chose Conshohocken and SORA West as its new corporate home.

Steel for the project’s framing system totaled 3,500 tons. One of the design team members commented that using structural steel allowed earlier design of the base structure so an early bid package could be issued. © Prakash Patel Photography

The company’s 1,500 Pennsylvania-based employees have recently moved into the 14-story, 524,838-sq.-ft office building, which was completed in late 2021. The space offers 11 floors of collaborative office space, including the lobby and ground-floor amenities; a two-level, 76,372-sq.ft basement parking facility with 173 parking spaces; a 16,000-sq.-ft rooftop terrace with a mechanical, electrical, and plumbing penthouse; and a high roof.

The chosen framing material for a project that reimagines a steel town? Steel, of course—3,500 tons of it.

© Connor Mayer

“Structural steel allowed earlier design of the base structure so an early bid package could be issued,” said Mal Bland, PE, principal and project executive/operations manager for IMEG (formerly The Harman Group), the structural engineer of record for the core and shell. “This allowed the structural steel fabricator to begin their work earlier. The base structure is normally on the critical path, so accelerating the steel fabricator and detailer results in an earlier turnover to the developer. In turn, this allows the developer to deliver the core and shell of the building to the corporate tenant sooner.”

“The use of steel allowed an efficient column grid of 30 ft by 45 ft that works well to maximize the efficiency of office layouts for corporate office buildings,” Bland continued. “And the use of structural steel resulted in approximately $20-per-sq.-ft savings in the structural cost.”

Topping out. Mal Bland

The site presented several challenges that the design team of IMEG, architect Gensler, and general contractor Intech were able to solve using the structural steel with slab on metal deck building, including working with a difficult slope and maintaining the durability of the steel-framed parking levels in the basement.

Five braced frames were needed to laterally brace the 184-ft-tall structure—three in the long direction and two in the short direction. The braced frames, mostly made up of W14 wide-flange chevron braces, were strategically placed within the interior of the floor plates, next to the stairs/elevators, to maximize open floor space and to offer unobstructed views around the perimeter of the building. To limit the lateral drift, moment frames were placed at the far ends of the building. These frames used partially restrained beam-to-column moment connections to keep service-level wind drift values within a code limit of H/400.

The building sits on a sloping site with a two-story retaining wall on one side and a three-story retaining wall on the opposite side. Mal Bland

Steel Parking

The team chose to frame the underground parking structure with structural steel as well. The two parking levels comprise one slab-on-grade level, one slab-on-metal deck level, and a parking speed ramp to access it from one level higher due to the steeply sloping terrain.

Vehicles can track in water and deicing salts, which puts the supported parking levels at risk for deterioration and corrosion. During the steel detailing stage, the team paid particular attention to the durability considerations highlighted in AISC Design Guide 18: Steel-Framed Open-Deck Parking Structures (aisc.org/dg) and ACI 362.1: Guide for the Design and Construction of Durable Concrete Parking Structure in an effort to limit stagnant water, protect the slab from water seeping in, and supply a path for water to exit.

An in-plane galvanized steel truss was used to distribute the nearly 2,400 kips of soil load from the retaining wall at the north through the 24-ft-wide ramp slab and into the floor diaphragms at Level 1 and the lower parking level. Mal Bland

The first step was for the steel framing and slab on metal deck to slope to drains in two directions rather than building a flat slab with varying thicknesses, which helped reduce the weight of the slab. The minimum design slope of the slab is 1.5% or 3∕16 in. per foot diagonally, which allowed for a minimum of 1% due to construction tolerances and beam camber and helped avoid any potential water ponding.

To accommodate a 2-ft setback in the curtainwall at the south face of the building, the design team introduced a sloping column between Levels 3 and 4.

The team chose G-90 vented galvanized metal decking for the slab-on-metal deck. The decking is a stay-in-place form only, with the slab having top and bottom reinforcing steel, and the perforations in the decking allow trapped water to be released from above the decking. The slabs were designed as continuous spans with negative bending reinforcing over the supports, with detailing that included additional top reinforcing over all the supports and at slab edges to minimize cracking above the supports. All reinforcing steel in both the supported slab on metal deck and slab-on-grade was epoxy coated. Additionally, slab on metal deck is susceptible to cracking, which gives water an entryway into the slab, so a urethane traffic membrane coating was applied throughout the supported parking levels to bridge the cracks and protect the slab.

The perimeter of the structure has a 3-ft-wide, 2-in.- tall concrete wash that slopes the top of the concrete away from the edge of the slab. The wash keeps water from the edge of the structure, walls, and façade elements and also prevents water from entering the elevator lobby.

A connection detail for the façade.

Another challenge with the garage was the perimeter retaining walls. In a typical underground structure, the slab and steel framing resist the soil loads and pass the loads through the diaphragm to the opposite side. Because of the ramping on this structure, each bay of the parking level is split and does not present a direct load path from one side to the other. In addition, the building sits on a sloping site with a two-story retaining wall on one side and a three-story retaining wall on the opposite side. Lastly, a parking access ramp spans almost two-thirds the length of the building next to the three-story retaining wall that drops down two stories. This required several split diaphragms with unique details in order to transfer lateral loads from soil loads to the braced frames and surrounding walls.

To access the underground parking levels, a structural speed ramp on the north side of the building slopes down from the entrance at Level 2, through the Level 1 slab, to the first level of underground parking. The ramp bisects the Level 1 floor diaphragm below grade, leaving nothing to resist the soil pressures retained by the three-story basement retaining wall. Ultimately, the speed ramp itself was used to resist these soil forces. An in-plane galvanized steel truss was used to distribute the nearly 2,400 kips of soil load from the retaining wall at the north through the 24-ft-wide ramp slab and into the floor diaphragms at Level 1 and the lower parking level, where the load is eventually counteracted by the passive soil pressure formed at the south side of the building.

A drawing of the 20-ft-tall, nearly 110-ft-wide rooftop screen wall, which hides mechanical equipment from view.

Plate Girders and Sloping Columns

There were varying layouts at the upper office levels and lower parking levels, so several columns had to be transferred out at the ground level. A series of 58-in.-deep to 68-in.-deep built-up steel plate girders were used to transfer out four columns with a range of factored loads from 1,800 kips to 2,250 kips. The heaviest of these plate girders weighed nearly 8.5 tons and was made of 3.5-in.-thick Gr 50 steel flange plates.

The south face of the building has a setback in the curtain-wall façade, a prominent architectural feature that affected the structural steel framing. To accommodate this 2-ft setback, a sloping column was introduced between Levels 3 and 4. The gravity load in this column of more than 1,200 kips translated into nearly 200 kips of horizontal thrust at each level. To resolve these forces, a series of diagonal WT braces were installed between the primary floor beams, from the work points at the top and bottom of the sloping column to the nearest braced frames. These forces were combined with the overall lateral forces in the building and incorporated into the final design of the braced frame elements.

In addition to the 14-story office building (tallest building at center of photo), the SORA West complex includes a hotel, a parking garage, and a historic firehouse adapted into a restaurant, all built around a public plaza. © Connor Mayer

The façade is a single-story glass curtain wall system attached to the top of the slab at the perimeter. Block-outs were provided in the slab on metal deck at the curtain wall mullions and infilled with grout after façade installation. It is easiest to connect the façade to the top of the slab, but this can cause a detailing problem with the finishes, so IMEG included a pocket within the concrete slab edge to hide the connection, which was grouted over after installation to be flush to the surrounding slab.

At the top of the building, the rooftop mechanical units reside behind a 20-ft-tall screen wall nearly 110 ft wide, braced on either side by two penthouses with individual braced frames. Since the wall did not align with the columns below, kickers could not be used. The team solved this issue with a horizontal ring truss at the top of the wall, and the lateral load from this truss transferred directly into the braced frames or into the slab on metal deck diagram of the penthouses.

From top to bottom, the development pays homage to steel history with modern steel framing, thus continuing the town’s steel story into the future.

Developer
Keystone Development + Investment

Owner
SORA West Ou Owner, LLC

General Contractor
Intech

Architect
Gensler

Structural Engineer/Parking Planning and Design
The Harman Group, now IMEG

Steel Team
Fabricator and Detailer

Cives Steel Company

Erector
XLE Metals/Independence Steel

Brian Sherman

Sean Pousley

Brian Sherman and Sean Pousley are both project engineers – structural with IMEG.

©AISC. View All Articles.

Forging a New Steel Story
https://lsc-pagepro.mydigitalpublication.com/article/Forging+a+New+Steel+Story/4405875/771471/article.html

Menu
  • MSC Site Home
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • List of Advertisers
  • Search Digital Archive (2010-present)
  • Search PDF Archive (Pre-2010)
  • Advertising Information
  • Mange Print Subscriptions
  • Contact MSC
  • AISC Site Home

Issue List

March 2026

February 2026

January 2026

December 2025

November 2025

October 2025

September 2025

August 2025

July 2025

June 2025

May 2025

April 2025

March 2025

February 2025

January 2025

December 2024

November 2024

October 2024

September 2024

August 2024

July 2024

June 2024

May 2024

April 2024

March 2024

February 2024

January 2024

December 2023

November 2023

October 2023

September 2023

August 2023

July 2023

June 2023

May 2023

April 2023

March 2023

February 2023

January 2023

December 2022

November 2022

October 2022

September 2022

August 2022

July 2022

June 2022

May 2022

April 2022

March 2022

February 2022

January 2022

December 2021

November 2021

October 2021

September 2021

August 2021

July 2021

June 2021

May 2021

April 2021

March 2021

February 2021

January 2021

December 2020

November 2020

October 2020

September 2020

August 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

December 2019

November 2019

October 2019

September 2019

August 2019

July 2019

June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

NASCC: The Steel Conference

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019

December 2018

November 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011/NASCC

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010


Library